伊赫巴里
Sunday, 22 February 2026
Breaking

Evolution Didn’t Wait: Marine Life Recovered Surprisingly Fast After Dinosaur Extinction

New analysis suggests ecosystems bounced back within millenn

Evolution Didn’t Wait: Marine Life Recovered Surprisingly Fast After Dinosaur Extinction
7DAYES
15 hours ago
46

United States - Ekhbary News Agency

Evolution Didn’t Wait: Marine Life Recovered Surprisingly Fast After Dinosaur Extinction

In the aftermath of the cataclysmic asteroid impact that ended the reign of the dinosaurs 66 million years ago, life on Earth appears to have staged a remarkable comeback with surprising speed. A new analysis of sedimentation rates suggests that marine ecosystems began recovering and diversifying within just a few thousand years of the mass extinction event, a timeline significantly shorter than many scientists had previously assumed. The findings, published in the journal Geology, prompt a fundamental rethinking of how rapidly evolution can rebuild biological diversity, offering potential parallels for understanding ecological resilience in the face of modern environmental upheaval.

For decades, the prevailing scientific consensus, informed by studies like a widely cited 2011 estimate, suggested that the first signs of recovery in marine life took approximately 30,000 years to emerge following the Chicxulub impact. This estimate was derived by measuring the thickness of rock layers between the extinction horizon and the first appearance of the microscopic plankton species *Parvularugoglobigerina eugubina*, a key marker for the dawn of post-extinction life. Time elapsed was then calculated using average sedimentation rates inferred from much longer geological intervals.

However, this established timeline began to face scrutiny from researchers like Dr. Christopher Lowery, a paleoceanographer at the University of Texas at Austin's Jackson School of Geosciences. Working with sediment cores drilled directly from the Chicxulub crater, Lowery and his colleagues employed a novel approach using Helium-3 (³He). This rare isotope of helium, delivered to Earth at a steady rate by interplanetary dust, served as a highly reliable chronometer to precisely date sediment accumulation. Their analysis indicated that *P. eugubina* evolved within a mere 6,000 years after the asteroid strike—a figure dramatically shorter than the previous estimates.

Initially hesitant to trust such a starkly contrasting result, Lowery and his team sought independent verification. They turned to published data from multiple global sites where researchers had independently measured ³He levels and identified the earliest post-extinction foraminifera, but had not previously combined these datasets to refine evolutionary timelines. By averaging data from six diverse locations, including the Chicxulub crater itself and marine deposits in Italy, Spain, and Tunisia, the researchers found consistent evidence of accelerated sediment accumulation. On average, the critical *P. eugubina* appeared approximately 6,400 years after the impact. Even more striking, other new plankton species emerged within just one to two millennia. This was followed by a rapid burst of diversification, as new species emerged to fill the ecological niches left vacant by the mass extinction, which had annihilated roughly three-quarters of all plant and animal life on Earth, including most marine plankton.

This revised, shorter timeline fundamentally recasts the Early Paleocene epoch not as a period of prolonged recovery from devastation, but as one characterized by extraordinarily rapid evolutionary innovation. Yet, even Lowery's updated timeline might understate the initial pace of recovery. In a separate study published last year, paleobiologist Brian Huber of the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History and colleagues utilized temperature proxies preserved within foraminifera shells. Their findings suggested that new plankton species likely emerged within mere decades of the asteroid impact. By integrating fossil data with sophisticated climate models, they concluded that following a brief period of global darkness caused by impact-induced dust and soot, the skies cleared relatively quickly. This was followed by rapid global warming, which may have acted as a potent catalyst for evolutionary change in the recovering oceans, effectively occurring "in the blink of a geological eye."

While Huber's analysis relies on inferred timing from climate models rather than direct sedimentation rate measurements, its implications are profound. If these models accurately capture the post-impact environmental shifts, then the emergence of new species could have been even faster than Lowery's revised estimates suggest. "Oh my gosh, it’s even faster than suggested," Huber commented, calling the findings "a real eye-opener."

Together, these studies underscore the remarkable speed and adaptability of life following catastrophic events. "Life really starts to rebound as soon as there is any possibility," noted Vivi Vajda, a paleobiologist at the Swedish Museum of Natural History, who was not involved in Lowery's research. However, experts caution against interpreting this rapid speciation as immediate ecosystem restoration. Lowery emphasizes that despite the swift evolutionary response, it still took millions of years for marine ecosystems to fully recover their complexity, and life forms comparable to the dinosaurs never returned. Evolution, it seems, is capable of bursts of brilliance and rapid innovation, but it cannot instantly undo the profound disruption of a mass extinction event.

Keywords: # evolution # dinosaur extinction # Chicxulub impact # marine life # ecosystem recovery # fossils # plankton # paleoceanography # speciation # paleontology