United States - Ekhbary News Agency
The conflict in Lebanon has emerged as a significant point of contention in President Trump's broader diplomatic push to de-escalate tensions with Iran. Discrepancies have surfaced between the United States and Israel on one side, and Iran and Pakistan on the other, regarding whether Lebanon is encompassed within the recently established two-week ceasefire agreement. These opposing interpretations of the truce's scope, coupled with Iranian accusations of U.S. and Israeli violations, are placing considerable strain on the fragile accord. Israel has continued its military operations in Lebanon, prompting strong warnings from Iran about "explicit costs and strong responses" to any breaches.
Read Also
→ European Stocks Rebound on Oil Dip Amid Stalled Peace Talks→ President Sisi Arrives in Uganda for Official Visit, Reviews Guard of Honor→ Barcelona Player Hamza Abdel Karim Included in Egypt's Provisional World Cup SquadIran's deputy foreign minister characterized Israel's recent strikes in Lebanon as a "grave violation" of the ceasefire, asserting that the U.S. must commit to either peace or conflict. He emphasized that the U.S. cannot simultaneously demand a ceasefire while accepting terms that exclude certain areas, specifically naming Lebanon. The speaker of Iran's parliament reiterated that Lebanon and other Iranian allies are an "inseparable part of the ceasefire," designating it as a primary point in the underlying proposal. The Pakistani Prime Minister, who brokered the deal, had also highlighted the importance of the Lebanon issue in the ceasefire announcement.
